My favorite beers come in bottles and in cans. I always buy it in bottles because I've heard that cans negatively impact the flavor of the beer.

Is this true?

If so, how does it work?

  • 8
    I met someone working for a large brewery company once who told me that the canned and the bottled version of their most popular brand indeed taste different, because for logistical reasons they are brewed in different cities and thus use water comming from different wells.
    – Philipp
    Commented Feb 4, 2014 at 18:41
  • 2
    I heard a good quote once about cans.. They are essentially small kegs and our general pre-disposition against cans is just a cultural one and not one based on any intrinsic quality of the beer. That being said our expectations alter our perceptions (the brain is a crazy thing) so if you think something tastes better in a can and you know your drinking from a can you'll enjoy the canned beer more than a person who expects the canned beer to taste worse. Commented Feb 5, 2014 at 19:30
  • Definately taste different cans of Carlton dry taste like aluminium even wen poured into a glass
    – Iszac
    Commented May 8, 2019 at 8:50

9 Answers 9


First, I love this question because it is actually interesting.

I researched this when I noticed that bottled coke tasted so much better than canned coke. Cans keep out all light so the contents actually never become tainted. The reason that most like bottled over canned is because they like the taste with those impurities. Some complain that they can taste aluminum with cans, but this is more than likely in their head since cans are lined with a thin layer of plastic.

I like certain beers better in cans and certain ones better in bottles. I would try both :)

  • 1
    One thing I never found out about cans is... is the outside lip also lined in plastic, or just the inside? I rarely drink beer straight from a bottle or can, but I almost always drink coke from the can.
    – object88
    Commented Feb 4, 2014 at 17:58
  • 1
    Not sure... but I actually doubt it. I suppose the smell of the can could effect the taste of the beer.
    – JLott
    Commented Feb 4, 2014 at 18:06
  • 1
    Nearly all glass bottled beverages are protected from UV rays by additives in the glass itself, or by a coating on the bottle if the glass can't provide the needed protection.
    – Adam Davis
    Commented Feb 4, 2014 at 19:07
  • 5
    It's possible that your bottled Coke tastes better than canned because it was bottled in Mexico and sweetened with cane sugar instead of corn syrup.
    – Robert
    Commented Feb 5, 2014 at 2:45
  • 1
    I would say that goes with the fact that the comfort from drinking from the bottle is better in my opinion. It would be interesting to pour both into a glass and see if you could actually tell the difference then.
    – JLott
    Commented Feb 5, 2014 at 22:15

As a member of a Studentenverbindung, having one principle of scientia, we of course tested this a long time ago with around a dozen or maybe a bit more testers.

We poured beer from the same manufacturer (fresh batch) into glasses and had people taste them, and for every glass (everyone had multiple ones) they had to say if they think it was from a bottle, a can, or a keg, and which tasted better.

After around 50 or 60 glasses, there was no statistical evidence whatsoever that any of the three could be identified, or tasted better.

From my personal experience though, I always think that a keg is better than a bottle is better than a can. But why is that so? I only have the theory that due to the feeling of the container you drink from, your taste is altered (just like food with the same flavour/taste somehow tastes different, with a different texture). Additionally I think the amount of beer that flows into your mouth is different, as well as maybe the turbulence, causing a different amount of carbon dioxide (or nitrogen, depending on your beer culture) to leave the beer before you can actually taste and swallow (which again changes the texture).

  • 13
    After 50 or 60 glasses, I also can't tell the difference between bottled, canned and cask beer. ;-) Commented Feb 5, 2014 at 10:42
  • 1
    @DavidRicherby: Among all, not per person ;) That would have been a fairly different scientific experiment then...
    – PlasmaHH
    Commented Feb 5, 2014 at 11:59
  • 2
    this. "the feeling of the container you drink from, your taste is altered" - pour it into a glass, and it all makes no difference any more.
    – Martin Ba
    Commented Jun 14, 2016 at 20:21
  • Science is good. I wish there were a link to a paper on this.
    – Eric S
    Commented Jan 15, 2021 at 18:14

I heard a quote from the revered Charlie Bamforth, who basically said that packaging beers in cans was a far better way to preserve the beer from brewery to customer than packaging in bottles, but bottles are still more aesthetically pleasing to the customer, so they are usually preferred. And that's from a man that has been head of Quality Assurance for a number of years.

It's purely in the mind - there isn't any real change to the beer. If anything, the difference with bottled beer is that the canned version is better preserved.


I actually do not think that the can itself changes the taste of the beer as much as the beer placed in the can may be a little different. I think that the real difference is going to be between keg beer and can/bottle beer.

Canned/bottled beer has a longer shelf life than keg beer. Canned/bottled beer has a shelf life of roughly 45-60 days, whereas a keg is only 25-40 days 1.

This means that worst case scenario for comparison you could be tasting a 2 month old canned beer versus a 3 week old draft. It can cause a difference in taste, there is a "freshness date" after all. (See this excellent answer from @mdma for more information on what happens as beer ages)

But where does this date come from? Almost all imported retail beer is pasteurized. The reason for pasteurizing the beer is from a business standpoint. It basically allows the beer to last longer and be shipped at room temperature (this applies to kegs, cans, and bottles).

An alternative to the pasteurization process is bottle conditioning. Most domestic beers follow this path. Essentially this process involves beers being sterile filtered and chilled to the point that any surviving bacteria, which could ferment the beer, become dormant 2.

So basically the probability that the beer begins to ferment is higher over time. A canned beer and a keg beer can taste the same if they both left the brewery at the same time, and both experienced the same conditions during the time it took them to reach you. It is just that kegs have a better chance of taking less time and of being better preserved.

From a practical standpoint though, bottles can cause broken glass, kegs weigh close to 50 lbs. full, and cans allow for shotgunning. Make sure your container of choice fits your environment :)

1. How long will a keg of draft beer remain fresh?
2. What is pasteurized and non-pasteurized keg beer?


I don't know how/if the actual storage in cans vs bottles affects the taste, however you should expect that they are not filled with the same beer.

Many companies will have different production logistics, and the can will often come from a different site than a bottle of the same brand, and will have slightly different water and production process, so the beers will taste slightly different before they even touch the can; and they may even have intentionally different production and additives.


If you are drinking beer directly from the can or bottle, then one measurable difference is the speed at which it warms up while you are drinking it. As glass is an insulator and aluminium is a conductor, you'd expect the can to be more efficient at transferring heat from your hand and the environment into the beer. So a glass bottle should keep the within the optimum temperature range for longer than the can.

This result is backed up by some research done by students at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, which compared the rate at which refrigerated liquid warms up to room temperature in glass and aluminium bottles. The heating rate differences should be even more noticeable if the bottles were in contact with a body temperature heat source.

This effect can be minimised by insulating the can using a stubby holder/beer cozy. In another experiment comparing cans held in a person's hand, over a 30 minute period an uninsulated can rose in temperature by about 14°C while the insulated can rose only 3 °C.



As a food engineer I can confirm you that the taste of the food (here beer) also changes in a bottle vs. can as the light (UV mainly) interacts differently than in a can where the light does not penetrate.

And as mentioned before in the case of beer, the quality of the water is very important and factories located in different locations use different waters, hence a different taste also.


So, besides the light changing the chemical makeup of the beer in bottles thing, drinking from a can absolutely modifies the flavor for me - because of the smell of the aluminum. But, pour it in a glass and I bet I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between any fresh container of the same beer.


In addition to the different rates at which the container warms up in the hand, there could also be the effect of the weight of the container itself.

I've long heard that gin tastes far better when served in a heavy glass.

A quick google shows that the effect can apply to other drinks too:

Secret to the perfect drink: serve it in a heavy glass, say experts

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.